The Vertical Farm

Is there enough land area on the planet for 7 – 11 billion people to live, grow enough food and still retain natural habitats and spaces ?

You might have heard the term ecological footprint – an expression of how much of the Earth’s surface it takes to provide your lifestyle in a sustainable way. The sustainable ecological capacity of the planet is estimated to be around 1.8 global hectares per person – unfortunately across the globe we now average more than 2.7 global hectares per person, with the average Britain requiring 4.89 global hectares, the average Australian 6.84 global hectares and American 8.00 global hectares. This compares with the average Chinese requiring 2.21 global hectares, the average Indian 0.91 global hectares, and the average Afghan only 0.62 global hectares ! [data].

The idea of vertical farming is one possible way to help overcome this problem – by effectively creating more productive land area for the cultivation of food, and in a sustainable way.

Several architects and designers have developed ideas, and several authors, notably Professor Dickson Despommier, have written extensively about the concept in recent years and many now believe the world’s first vertical farms will shortly be built.

 

Photo by Gordon Graff, via Wikicommons

Boar in the Forest – Bats in the Bedroom

A couple of years ago the United Nations announced that for the first time in human history more people now live in urban environments than rural ones. I’ve gone the other way.

I was very much an urbanite, living in cities for most of my life – growing-up in Birmingham, studying in Swansea and Ghent, and working in London, Brighton and Reading, before moving with my family to the fantastic Forest of Dean seven years ago.

Before moving to the Forest my daily contact with nature was generally limited to spying a few birds in the garden, perhaps the occasional hungry squirrel and very occasional glimpses of the odd urban fox. Not any more ! Over the last few years in my garden alone I’ve had swallows, a pheasant, grass snakes, lizards, frogs, toads, jays, woodpeckers, hedgehogs, slow worms, buzzards, foxes, bats and sheep (which roam wild in the Forest), and while out walking in the woods I’ve seen deer, badgers, goshawks and wild boar. Only a few nights ago we awoke to find a long-eared bat flying around the bedroom !

Boar at night (very dark)          Pheasant with the chickens       Bat rescued from my bedroom

To my mind, there’s something very special about living in and amongst the natural world in this way, and in particular the larger animals. It’s very easy in the middle of a big city to forget that our man-made environments of concrete, tarmac, steel and glass are not all there is on the planet. The continued presence of natural environments helps remind us of the undeveloped landscapes of generations ago, and that human beings form only part of the complex interconnected web of life on Earth. Ultimately our future still depends on healthy, sustainable ecosystems, and perhaps we might want to be a bit more aware of those around us ?

But the truth is that in many parts of the developed world, including the UK, there is very little original habitat left. In the UK at least this isn’t a new phenomena – people have been radically changing the landscape for thousands of years; the Surrey heathlands were once forests which were cut down by neolithic man, and many of what we consider the typically British tree species comprising our forests are not in fact native, having been introduced since the middle ages, including horse chestnuts, sycamores, walnuts, firs, poplars, larch and even the ‘English’ Elm.

Despite the pressures of development and sprawl, there is an increasing movement to deliberately re-create natural wilderness areas and landscapes – including reintroducing many of the large animal species that were hunted to extinction, or lost through habitat destruction. This ‘rewilding’ aims both to create and conserve habitat and species for it’s own sake, enhancing and preserving biodiversity, but importantly also to re-establish our relationship with the natural world, perhaps leading us to afford it more value, status and respect.

Examples of rewilding range from the re-establishment of American Bison populations in Montana, to the reintroduction of beavers and elk in Scotland, and perhaps shortly the wolf.

If you’re interesting in supporting conservation biology and rewilding in a small way you might consider planting a wildlife area in your garden, something I’ll be working on in my own garden next year.

If you think on longer term timescales then you might want to plant a prehistoric tree !

The Wollemi Pine is a species of tree once known only through the fossil record from 50 million years ago. But in 1994 a few trees were found growing happily in a valley not far from Sydney, Australia – now designated as the Wollemi National Park. To help conserve this living fossil, conservationists are promoting the idea of growing the trees in domestic settings throughout the world – and thanks to my brother-in-law, we now have one in our garden . . .

Not quite Jurassic Park, but you get the idea !

RELATED ARTICLES – Not Just the Plants That Grow

Photo by Schristia, via Flickr

The Uncultured Project

Occasionally Next Starfish will feature a Spotlight post, highlighting a particular project or group that is working to improve the world, and that could do with your support – either by getting involved, by making a financial donation, or simply by promoting the project and the work they do, to your friends and network.

The Uncultured Project is really one man’s ‘uncultured’, ‘unplanned’ and ‘unexpected’ mission to simply make the world a better place. Shawn Ahmed was a student at the University of Notre Dame, and was inspired by a speech made by social justice activist and author Dr Jeffrey Sachs. In response Shawn withdrew from University, liquidated all his savings and began his work to help some of the poorest people in the world.

Shawn calls himself a bridge-builder, linking the poorest people in the world with those of us in the rich world, through the internet. His YouTube channel has now amassed over 2.8million views, and this year he won the online Davos Debates competition and got the opportunity to attend the Davos World Economic Forum.

In using technology to connect the rich world to the poor, his message is simple:

“The best people who can speak about poverty are the poor themselves.”

Take a few minutes to look at Shawn’s website and various online media channels, and if you think you might want to get more involved Shawn explains how:

“I know I can’t single-handedly end global poverty. My goal is to help raise awareness by sharing my story with others. It’s my hope that, through sharing these stories and showing the specific impact I am having, people will start to imagine the complexity behind the issue of global poverty. Despite all it’s complexity, I still believe we can be the generation that ends extreme global poverty.

I also hope that my project can change the conversation on global poverty. When I started this project, the conversation charities were having about global poverty was all about guilt. The only way people saw global poverty was through black & white pictures of emaciated crying children – with an ominous voice (or celebrity spokesperson) saying that if we don’t donate a cup of coffee worth of money a day they will die.

As I have been trying to prove with this project – there is a better way to engage people on the issue of global poverty. I don’t claim to have all the answers but I do believe that what we call “social media” can be used for more than just a mere fundraising and marketing platform. I believe the real potential is that we can finally hear what the poor have to say and help them exactly as they wish to be helped – and portrayed.

This project isn’t about raising as much money as possible. If you like what you see, you can donate. But spreading the word is just as (if not more) important. If you do want to donate, you can pick between donating directly to help the poor or donating to help to sustain this project. Donations to these funds are not used to give myself a salary. Instead, I am trying to sustain myself through support from friends and some family and other income generating activities. Doing things this way (and as just a guy) is inspired by my desire to find new ways to respond to criticisms in Bangladesh against charities & NGOs – one of which being that charities and NGOs “eat the cash”.

The Uncultured Project.

Photo by Catiemagee, via Flickr

Meet Toby Ord

The current series of ‘Foto Friday’ posts are focussing on individuals who are currently working in their own way to try and make a positive difference in the world.

Toby Ord is an Oxford University academic, who earns around £33,000 a year (the UK individual national average income is £26,000 a year), but has decided to donate everything he earns above £18,000 a year to charity. He has also donated all his £15,000 savings. His wife has made a similar pledge. He hopes to donate more than a million pounds to charity over the course of his career.

He has founded the Giving What We Can Organisation, whose members pledge to donate at least 10% of what they earn to alleviate global poverty.

Ord lectures on personal ethics, and takes the view that if you feel strongly about the extreme poverty and unfairness in the world you should do something about it. He says he still has a comfortable life; “What’s really important in our lives is spending time together, chatting with our close friends and reading beautiful books and listening to beautiful music”

“I’ve also changed the way I look at the world. I don’t want more stuff. If someone said to me ‘Here’s one thousand pounds’ and I had to spend it on myself I would feel anxious about that because I just want to help people more and it would be a very frustrating time.”


Photo by Giving What We Can

The Fishbowl of Happiness

This post is a journey between two TED talks.

If you spend much time browsing in bookshops like I do, you’ll probably have noticed there’s an ever increasing number of books promoting voluntary simplicity, slowing down, downshifting, thrift, returning to the ‘good life’ etc.

They all have slightly different ideas about what aspects of modern life we should be suspicious of, and what we can do to go about living simpler, more authentic and fulfilling lives. I quite like many of these books, which I think often contain good advice (though often inter-spaced with a lot of waffle and self-justification), but it seems not too many of them seem to consider why adopting a simpler lifestyle seems such an attractive proposition for many of us.

One of the reasons is anything but obvious: we have far too much choice to be happy.

We have more options open to us than ever before – what to eat, what to wear, what we do, where we work, where we go on holiday, what we watch on TV, what music to listen to, how to manage our health, what sort of lifestlye we want. It’s stressful to decide, and if we’re to make confident decisions we need to have done our research beforehand. We all constantly run the risk of discovering we’ve chosen badly and missed a better option or opportunity.

Henry Ford famously described the available range of  his cars with the phrase “you can have any colour you want so long as its black” (though he probably never actually said it). Later when we were able to exercise a little choice, our cars also began to make statements about us – a badge of our identity as consumers, a further layer of choice, meaning and complexity.

But we are now faced with so many choices on a daily basis that we are overwhelmed, anxious or even numbed by the prospect. We might make the wrong choice, or a sub-optimum choice. Are you on the best energy tariff ? Best mobile phone tariff ? Did you pick the best handset available ? Is your browser the most secure/user-friendly ? Do you have the optimal level of insurance cover ? What are you going to watch on TV tonight ? Have you set the recorder for everything you might want to watch ? What music are you listening to ? What great new bands are you missing out on ? What books (or blogs) are you reading ? Is your food or clothing as ethical as it could be ? Have you got the best deal on your next holiday ?

Postmodern life and in particular the internet is responsible – we simply have so much information and so many options available to us. What should be liberating and empowering tends to have the opposite effect and becomes stressful, exhausting and depressing. The psychologist Barry Schwartz describes walking out of a jeans store after an hour of trying on different pairs of jeans, and although he was wearing the best fitting pair of jeans he’d ever worn in his life, he felt worse about them than any pair before . . . he describes the various reasons why and examines the negative consequences of being surrounded by constant choice in his book ‘The Paradox of Choice: Why Less is More“.

He also makes the observation that the rich world is surrounded by too much choice, which makes us unhappy, while those in the poor world have far too little choice.

But if too much choice is making us unhappy, what should we do ?

The answer is simple: lower our expectations and learn to be happy with what we already have.

Does this really work ? Can we do this ?

Yes, according to psychologist Daniel Gilbert. In his TED talk Daniel describes the evidence for his view that we all can ‘synthesise happiness’. Synthetic happiness is what we tend to ‘fake’ in order to make ourselves feel better when we don’t get what we want, as opposed ‘real’ happiness, which is how we feel when we do get what we want. The common perception is that synthetic happiness isn’t properly real – just a story we tell ourselves to hide from the truth of disappointment.

In his talk Daniel describes Moreese Bickham, who spent 37 years wrongfully imprisoned in Luisianna State Penetentary, and upon being released said “I don’t have one minutes regret. It was a glorious experience”, and others who appear to have ‘synthesised’ happiness, to avoid facing a disappointing reality.

But recent clinical research indicates that ‘synthetic’ happiness is every bit as real, and that we can therefore become genuinely happier simply by telling ourselves that we are . . . and if we consciously limit our ambitions and lower our expectations, we are likely to find ourselves becoming genuinely happier and less dissatisfied with our lives, and by not constantly striving for more, become more likely to help improve the lives of those most at need in the world.

“Live simply so that others may simply live” - variously attributed to both Mahatma Gandhi, and Elizabeth Ann Seton

Photo by Bitterjug, via Flickr